AI agents book the signing, build the package, file with the county and chase every rejection, so your closers stop chasing status.
Thirty minutes with the engineer who builds these agents. No deck.
And it's never the file you're watching.
Availability checked across buyer, seller, lender and agent. Time proposed, confirmed, done.
Assembled from the file and checked against your list. Gaps flagged early, not at the table.
The agent books it, confirms the format, and tells everyone when something moves.
Filed to the right county through your e-recording provider and watched through to recorded. Rejections are surfaced with the county’s reason as soon as they come back, and routed to the right person.
Recorded documents indexed against the transaction automatically. No manual sorting.
Once recording confirms, the agent preps what production needs and pushes the file to issue.
Availability gathered, time confirmed.
AgentPackage built, gaps flagged early.
AgentYour closer runs the closing. Always.
Your closerFiled through your e-recording provider.
AgentRejection surfaced. A person decides the fix.
Your teamDetails prepped. Underwriting stays yours.
AgentALTA Best Practices give you two business days from settlement to get documents out for recording, and thirty days to issue and deliver the policy. The agent works backwards from both. The package is checked against your list before the signing, not after it. Submission goes out through your e-recording provider on the day of settlement rather than whenever the queue clears.
From there the file is watched, not filed away. The agent holds the open submission until the county returns something. If that is a rejection, the reason comes back attached to the file and lands with a named person. If it is a recording, the instrument details are indexed against the transaction and the policy details are prepped for production the same moment, so post-closing starts with a complete file instead of a hunt.
Your closers stop asking where a file is. The agent already knows, and it has already chased it.
The agent works where your team already works.
Product names are the trademarks of their respective owners. Listing them indicates the systems we connect to, not a partnership or endorsement. We confirm what is supported for your specific configuration during the audit.
Your volume, your counties, where the chasing costs you.
We map your real process and put a number on the hours available.
Tuned on your own packages and counties, handoffs agreed up front.
Connected to production with review checkpoints, then tuned on real volume.
We give you a timeline for your own build after the workflow audit, once we have seen your systems and your county mix.
No. The agent does coordination, submission and chasing. Every decision that carries liability stays with your people. The point is to give the hours back, and how you spend them is your call.
A monthly platform fee plus a per-file rate that scales with volume. You get a firm number after the workflow audit, before committing to anything.
We submit through your e-recording provider, including Simplifile, CSC and ePN. Coverage varies by jurisdiction, so we confirm your specific counties during the audit and tell you plainly which ones cannot be automated yet.
The agent preps the package and tracks it, then routes the physical submission to your team. You keep the audit trail either way.
Every submission is tracked through to recorded. When a county returns a rejection, the reason comes back with it and the file is routed to the right person rather than waiting to be noticed.
We start with one workflow and a subset of counties, then widen from there. You get a dated timeline for your own build after the workflow audit, not before.
Bring your volume and your county list. We'll tell you honestly what's automatable and what isn't.
